The Controversial Nature of Out-Lunch at Grace

Media clipped from Grocery Dive

The ability to steer away from the lunch offered in the lower commons at 46 Cooper Square and venture out to dine has long been considered a privilege— the administration making it well clear that it can be revoked at any given moment. 

For 9th graders, this is brought to the table, with over a year to wait and plenty of connections to bond in the meantime. However, for sophomores, this lurks at the forefront of desires when in the confines of the building, as out-lunch is designated to occur in the late stages of one’s 10th-grade year. The main reason, as explained by staff and faculty, is to allow friendships to form and grade chemistry to develop in the early stages of high school. 

This contains flaws, however, ones that particularly infuriate third-quarter members of the Class of 2028. As Judah W. ‘28 puts it, “out-lunch is ridiculously inflated. We have been eating with the same peers day in and day out for months on end, and to cap it off, we have to meet set goals to get out-lunch. I mean, come on. Leaving to eat would do nothing more than promote freedom and teach responsibility— it just seems like they [admin] don’t want the responsibility of more students out of the building.” 

Archie A. ‘28 further emphasized this by claiming, “lunch options remain limited when unappealing, especially at this age, we are more than suited to go out and eat what we’d like.” 

These two students broadly demonstrate that there is a fundamental issue with how the school handles dining, but Julien E. ‘28 provides a stark contrast, questioning whether a problem exists at all. He explains, “out-lunch looks good, but it may not be all that it seems. We already have great dynamics, the salad bar offers plentiful choices, and more importantly, staying in school saves time, money, and although out-lunch is just an option, so these could coexist, students would often be dragged along by what their friends are doing, now what they themselves should be.” 

Fundamentally, contradictions exist in almost all the actions the school would take, but we must wonder: are the current impositions on lunchtime options too harsh?

Georges L. ‘28, the author, is a staff writer for The Grace Gazette.